Which method is used to track error status during an import?

Which method is used to track error status during an import?

• A. Response mapping
• B. Transformation mapping
• C. Aggregation mapping
• D. Results logging

Answer: (A)

The method used to track error status during an import is response mapping. This approach allows for defining how errors and other responses from the integration are handled after an import process. Response mapping helps ensure that any issues that arise during data import are accurately reported, making it easier to troubleshoot and resolve problems. This method captures the feedback from the target system regarding the success or failure of the import operation, providing detailed information on what went right and what went wrong. Such tracking is crucial in integration processes as it facilitates better data handling and ensures that data integrity is maintained throughout the import lifecycle. In contrast, the other options focus on different aspects of data processing. Transformation mapping generally pertains to how data is converted or altered during integration, while aggregation mapping deals with how multiple data points are compiled or summarized. Results logging is more about tracking outcomes of processes rather than specifically focusing on error statuses during an import. Hence, response mapping is the most appropriate choice for monitoring error statuses.

The method used to track error status during an import is response mapping. This approach allows for defining how errors and other responses from the integration are handled after an import process. Response mapping helps ensure that any issues that arise during data import are accurately reported, making it easier to troubleshoot and resolve problems.

This method captures the feedback from the target system regarding the success or failure of the import operation, providing detailed information on what went right and what went wrong. Such tracking is crucial in integration processes as it facilitates better data handling and ensures that data integrity is maintained throughout the import lifecycle.

In contrast, the other options focus on different aspects of data processing. Transformation mapping generally pertains to how data is converted or altered during integration, while aggregation mapping deals with how multiple data points are compiled or summarized. Results logging is more about tracking outcomes of processes rather than specifically focusing on error statuses during an import. Hence, response mapping is the most appropriate choice for monitoring error statuses.